Jump to content

Stockstill hints Matusz to Frederick is likely


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Per Roch:

On the local scene, I know a lot of fans are wondering where left-hander Brian Matusz will begin his professional career outside of the Arizona Fall League. I've speculated that he'll be assigned to Single-A Frederick, and a conversation I had earlier today with David Stockstill, director of player development, hasn't changed my mind.

Stockstill said a final decision hasn't been made, but he also noted how well it worked for Jake Arrieta earlier this year when the right-hander started out at Frederick. He was supposed to move up to Double-A Bowie at the break, but his inclusion on the Olympic team altered those plans. Otherwise, he would have joined catcher Matt Wieters on the Baysox's roster.

"It wouldn't be drastically off the charts to look at the same plan for Matusz that we had for Arrieta," Stockstill said.

http://www.masnsports.com/index_blog_roch.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Makes sense to me, though I doubt others here will like it.

If Weiters, who was the best college bat in his draft, and Arrieta, who lit up the AFL (albeit in a relief role), both started in A ball, I don't see why they'd change the plan with Matusz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Matusz should start at Frederick. I think two months there, assuming he's successful, will be more than enough though. I have a feeling people will be calling for him to be moved up well before the O's move him up.

Depends.

If he's lighting up the league, then I agree, he should be moved up ... but if he's doing 'ok' to 'pretty good', then he should stay put. Let him prove he doesn't belong there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprising at all considering David's cautious approach for level placements.

In the interests of learning more about the minor league system than the (approximately) nothing I already know, do you consider this cautiousness to be a good thing? Around the beginning of June each season we inevitably hear the grumblings on the board about how players who have "proven themselves" aren't being promoted in a timely manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the interests of learning more about the minor league system than the (approximately) nothing I already know, do you consider this cautiousness to be a good thing? Around the beginning of June each season we inevitably hear the grumblings on the board about how players who have "proven themselves" aren't being promoted in a timely manner.

I personally believe the Orioles can be too cautious at times with players and do not always challenge them, especially when age is an issue. Last year, I felt Arrieta spent too much time in Frederick and that Snyder should have gotten a chance at Double-A over the last six weeks of the season. You could certainly build a case that Matt Angle could have spent the last six weeks of the season at Frederick and that Mick Mattaliano spent way too much time at Delmarva.

Looking over other organizations, the Orioles seem to promote their players very slowly compared to most other organizations. I can tell you that Tillman would not have been in Double-A last year if he had been originally drafted by the Orioles. He most likely would have spent his entire 2008 at Frederick and he would be looking at his first taste of Double-A in 2009. Instead, he proved he could pitch effectively at Double-A and could be in the mix for a job in Baltimore by mid-2009 if he pitches well.

There's something to be said about stability and I do like the fact that Stockstill does not promote organizational guys just because they played at the previous level the year before unless they've earned a spot on that next team. He has been much more aggressive in bringing in quality minor league free agents like Jeff Nettles or Ryan McCarthey to fill dead spots in the organization instead of just moving up filler players who will struggle. This makes the teams better overall and allows the Orioles to not rush players that may not be ready. This was status quo when Syd Thrift was running the minor leagues through proxy farm director Don Buford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same plan as Arrieta? You mean put a guy that is too advanced for single A and then leave him down there way to long?

More brilliance by our MiL people! :rolleyes:

Not to be disrespectful to you, as I know you've said for a while that Arrieta should have been pushed up the system, but there are many more prospects with Matusz's prospect status that have started in A-ball to begin their career -- Price comes to mind, and he's been mentioned quite often in this same discussion. I don't think our system is in anyway stupid to take a cautious stance with any of our elite, young pitchers.

I support your idea of aggressively pushing him, but I'm okay with starting him at Frederick. So long as they promote him when he masters each level, command, etc., then starting at Frederick shouldn't hurt his development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same plan as Arrieta? You mean put a guy that is too advanced for single A and then leave him down there way to long?

More brilliance by our MiL people! :rolleyes:

How was he left down there too long? They would have promoted him but there was no point to move him to Bowie for four starts before the Olympics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How was he left down there too long? They would have promoted him but there was no point to move him to Bowie for four starts before the Olympics.

Right...Arrieta would have been in Bowie if not for the Olympics. Plus it has been stated before that Arrieta is probably the most advanced pitcher (other than Matusz) in the O's system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked tonight with a scout from another organization who saw Matusz in the AFL and he thinks he's major league ready right now. He thinks starting him in A-ball is too low, but according to him it doesn't matter because he's going to have success no matter what level he starts at.

Just some food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked tonight with a scout from another organization who saw Matusz in the AFL and he thinks he's major league ready right now. He thinks starting him in A-ball is too low, but according to him it doesn't matter because he's going to have success no matter what level he starts at.

Just some food for thought.

Wow, that's awesome to hear.

Did he go into any detail as to why he thinks that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Updated as May 6th.. Big drop for Baumler due to velocity drop and lack of pitches thrown per start. A few new names break into top 30 and with the FCL playing one game, Almeyda and Wager (rehab) pop onto the list now that they've played. Liranzo should show up next week.
    • Irvin will be the one to go to the pen. You also wonder if the Os look to trade a trade a starter, especially if Povich and maybe McDermott show they can come up and help if needs be.  I tend to doubt the Os go this route but I wouldn’t completely dismiss it. They have to figure out some way to get in a real back end reliever to go with Kimbrel, Cano and DC.  They aren’t going to trade Mayo or Basallo and may not move Kjerstad for one either. So, that leaves a lot of other good prospects or taking from the Ml roster.  All of it makes sense on different levels.
    • Yea but for a piece that helps now.  I don’t think I trade him for a prospect package unless it’s some kind of high end pitching prospect that should be ML ready at some point this year or especially next year. That said, I don’t think that pitcher will be available for Santander, so getting something that helps now for him is something we absolutely should be looking to do. I would rather see Hays get back here, show he’s healthy and start performing and then move him though.  Santander has some leadership stuff you like.  
    • His statcast numbers are trending well. Only thing that’s surprising so far is that he’s not walking a lot.  
    • That new routine includes getting himself warmed up differently and more quickly than as as a starter. These nuances are why no one can assume a starter can just become a great reliever and automatically get a bump in velocity.  We also don't know how quickly he can rebound to be able to pitch again. Now, he hadn't pitched in a week yesterday so he should been fresh, so perhaps the new warmup routine did not see him fully warmed up. Or maybe a lack of adrenaline pitching late in a 6-0 game was why we saw about a MPH difference in his velocities? Suarez didn't miss many bats and actually missed none with his fastball. His fastball has typically gotten a lot of whiff.  The good news is he didn't allow any hits or walks, and needed only 24 pitches to get through 2.1 innings.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...